Kayla Radomski shared glimpses from the ceremony on social media.
This report is indexed by BAGANBAZAR GRAPH with its original publisher named and linked for readers.
Read at original outlet ↗
BAGANBAZAR GRAPHSource-attributed newsWORLD deskThere is something profoundly instructive about a rainbow coalition of politically estranged bedfellows suddenly discovering a common language to STOP ALIA ahead of 2027. When politicians with vaporising histories, ambitions, political grievances and sharply uncoordinated political philosophies abruptly GANG against one man, the knowledgeably discerning voter must peep beyond the hullabaloo of the “raging” unity and interrogate the purpose of such rainbow-ling and coalition-ing.The emerging “Tower of Babel” against Governor Alia should not automatically be mistaken for a MOVEMENT of redemption or a political crusade seeking a common good or advancing pro-Benue essence. Certainly, it is not a gathering of superior ideas or goodwill, but a convergence of people driven and united by vengeance, justifiably or otherwise. It is a gathering of proponents of zero party discipline, zero common good, yet 100% individualism.But Benue must make no mistake that the rainbow coalition is for change. IT is a ferocious coalition of the willing, with cash and glamour ready to roll out the bullion vans. IT IS a bowing rainbow for the restoration of lost privileges, displaced tiers of influence, and renewed access to the inner chambers of political decision-making and power. They have gathered.Granted, democracy actually permits alliances, even between former adversaries, as is the case in today's Benue State. But the point is that those who align must be bold with their true intentions, no matter how selfish and self-serving; which is precisely the case with the BENUE coalition.They may gang up against Alia, metaphorically or otherwise, but Benue people must ask the more crucial question. Which is? What exactly are they united to achieve beyond removing Alia? Is it that Alia is not buildi
BAGANBAZAR GRAPHSource-attributed newsWORLD deskThe Kaduna Geographic Information Service, KADGIS, has warned members of the public against purchasing plots of land in six police barracks across Kaduna State, declaring that it has not approved any land layout or sale by Aftech Industries Limited in the affected locations.In a public notice signed by the Director-General of KADGIS, Bashir Garba Ibrahim, dated October 21, 2026, and referenced KADGIS/OFF/585/VOL. I, the agency said it had neither authorised nor approved the company to create, design, subdivide or develop any land layout within police barracks in the state.The affected locations are Gabasawa Barracks, Blocks A and B; Mounted Troops Barracks; SPO’s Quarters along College Road; Mounted Troops Barracks in Kabala; and MTD Barracks in Sabon-Gari.KADGIS said it had not entered into any partnership with Aftech Industries Limited or granted the company permission to allocate or sell plots within the affected barracks.“For the avoidance of doubt, KADGIS has not entered into any partnership or granted any approval to Aftech Industries Limited to undertake land layout creation or land sales within the affected Police Barracks,” the notice stated.The agency cautioned that any purported partnership, allocation or sale of land in the locations should not be interpreted as having its approval or endorsement.“Members of the public are therefore strongly advised not to purchase or make payments for any plots within the affected Police Barracks without first confirming the legal status of the property and the validity of the title with KADGIS,” it said.The agency further warned that letters, agreements, receipts or other documents presented in connection with such transactions do not, on their own, constitute proof of a valid Kaduna State land title or KADGIS approval.It
BAGANBAZAR GRAPHSource-attributed newsWORLD deskThe Director-General of the National Information Technology Development Agency, NITDA, Kashifu Abdullahi Inuwa, has warned that artificial intelligence, AI, is making cyber attacks more sophisticated, increasing the risk of online fraud, social engineering, deepfakes and disinformation.Addressing ICT journalists in Abuja, Inuwa said cybersecurity in the age of AI differs significantly from attacks carried out before the technology became widely available, noting that AI can strengthen both cyber attacks and defence mechanisms.“That means you can use AI to attack or to defend. Attacking with AI is more successful than attacking before AI. Likewise, defending,” he said.The NITDA chief explained that the growing use of AI agents to automate organisational workflows could expose institutions to serious risks if hackers gain control of the systems.“Imagine someone hijacking your AI agent. It's like someone taking over control of your staff. It will make attack very easy for anyone taking over your AI data,” he said.He added that although AI could make cyber attacks easier, it could also improve threat detection and enable organisations to respond more effectively to security breaches.Inuwa, however, warned that human beings were increasingly becoming targets of cybercriminals, who exploit psychological weaknesses and social engineering rather than attempting to breach computer systems directly."As a hacker, it's easier for me to hack humans than hacking systems. If I can do social engineering tricks to get to do what I want, why should I spend days or months trying to break into a system?” he asked.He expressed concern over the influence of social media, noting that people increasingly rely on online platforms for news and information, making them vulnerable to AI-generated