BAGANBAZAR GRAPHEXPLORE · ANALYZE · GROW
Theme
LiveDesk
BusinessCass Sunstein on Worst-case ScenariosWorldThe Snoop: Billionaire’s cheap deal in Tassie, Shoebridge gives News Corp a reason to swear, and moreWorldThe media’s deficit fetish harms the ‘people doing it tough’ it claims to representWorldTrump offers U.S. help to Russia after plague death; WHO assesses the situation as low riskWorldGoldman: Diesel prices set to stay high through 2027 as refineries struggle to meet demand
Business/Source-attributed reporting
Business DESK

Cass Sunstein on Worst-case Scenarios

Cass Sunstein of the University of Chicago talks about the ideas in his latest book, Worst-Case Scenarios. How should individuals and societies cope with low-probability events with potentially catastrophic consequences? In this conversation with EconTalk host Russ Roberts, Sunstein discusses the uselessness of the precautionary principle as a guide to behavior and the psychological challenges we all face in coping with uncertain, risky events. He also speculates why we have chosen politically to treat terrorism and global warming so differently.

Published Oct 6, 2026 · 4:15 AMOriginal source: EconTalk1 reads
Cass Sunstein of the University of Chicago talks about the ideas in his latest book, Worst-Case Scenarios. How should individuals and societies cope with low-probability events with potentially catastrophic consequences? In this conversation with EconTalk host Russ Roberts, Sunstein discusses the uselessness of the precautionary principle as a guide to behavior and the psychological challenges we all face in coping with uncertain, risky events. He also speculates why we have chosen politically to treat terrorism and global warming so differently.
ORIGINAL SOURCE

EconTalk

This report is indexed by BAGANBAZAR GRAPH with its original publisher named and linked for readers.

Read at original outlet ↗
RELATED COVERAGE

More from this desk.

BAGANBAZAR GRAPHSource-attributed newsBUSINESS desk
Business

Henry Aaron on Health Care Costs

In this bonus middle-of-the-week podcast, Henry Aaron of the Brookings Institution talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about health care costs. Researchers in a New England Journal of Medicine article have estimated that the US could save $209 billion if the US went to a single-payer system like Canada. Is this number reliable? Aaron takes a deeper look at the estimate and discusses the relevance of such estimates for health care policy. This is a special mid-week podcast. It's a follow-up to an earlier podcast with Arnold Kling that raised the issue of administrative costs and potential savings from going to a single-payer system. It also ties in with recent discussions here at EconTalk about the challenges of accurate measurement in the social sciences. We hope you enjoy it. If not, come back Monday when our regular schedule resumes.

Original sourceEconTalk
BAGANBAZAR GRAPHSource-attributed newsBUSINESS desk
Business

Joel Waldfogel on Markets, Choice, and the Tyranny of the Market

Joel Waldfogel of the Wharton School of Business talks about the idea in his new book, The Tyranny of Markets: Why You Can't Always Get What You Want. He argues that when fixed costs are large, markets don't necessarily give people what they want and that, analogous to the political process, you can be hurt as the number of people with preferences that differ from yours gets larger. Host Russ Roberts challenges Waldfogel's claim that these phenomena are widespread and argues that in many cases, markets ultimately solve these problems. They discuss the amount of variety in newspapers, radio, and airline travel, along with how economics generally looks at fixed costs and consumer sovereignty.

Original sourceEconTalk